I assume this is just fixing the types to match the
assumed prototype.
This needs a comment but if that's the intent, it is
OK.
On 7/3/2014 4:37 AM, Daniel Cederman wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h | 2 +-
> cpukit/score/src/smp.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h
> b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h
> index e2fee39..ba16c8f 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h
> +++ b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static inline void
> _SMP_Inter_processor_interrupt_handler( void )
> * @param[in] cpu_index The target processor of the message.
> * @param[in] message The message.
> */
> -void _SMP_Send_message( uint32_t cpu_index, unsigned long message );
> +void _SMP_Send_message( uint32_t cpu_index, uint32_t message );
>
> /**
> * @brief Request of others CPUs.
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/smp.c b/cpukit/score/src/smp.c
> index f0554fe..59448a0 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/smp.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/smp.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ void _SMP_Request_shutdown( void )
> _Giant_Drop( self_cpu );
> }
>
> -void _SMP_Send_message( uint32_t cpu_index, unsigned long message )
> +void _SMP_Send_message( uint32_t cpu_index, uint32_t message )
> {
> Per_CPU_Control *cpu = _Per_CPU_Get_by_index( cpu_index );
>
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
