On 7/1/26 2:55 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 10:51:26AM -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
As someone who has proposed Changes, I find dealing with the wiki to
be
really cumbersome. I'm used to editing technical documentation stored
in git
in markdown in my preferred text editor or using a standard word
processor
for other types of writing. The Wiki brings another syntax and another
interface that I have to deal with.
I am also under the impressions that it's difficult to properly
process
Changes from the wiki without a lot of error-prone, manual steps. I
have
seen various issues with the current process where formatting of
Discourse
posts and FESCo tickets is messed up, Change owners aren't CCed on
FESCo
tickets and Bugzilla trackers (which caused process delays), Changes
get
stuck in one of the steps of the process, etc. I know there were some
new
AI-assisted tooling introduced recently, but that only seemed to make
problems worse.
Do you have any specifics on how the tooling changes made things worse?
I think this would be useful feedback for both the people who worked on
them as
well as the people who are using them.
Yes, [1,2,3] are the recent FESCo tickets about this.
[1] https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/tickets/issues/3515
[2] https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/tickets/issues/3524
[3] https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/tickets/issues/3592
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
