On Mon, 2026-06-29 at 16:18 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > IMHO the goal of any git based workflow is to fully eliminate any/all > change wrangler scripts, and indeed eliminate most of the work that > the change wrangler has to do. "change wrangler" as a concept should > probably not even exist if we got the process right.
I don't think this is realistic. There are still parts of the process that require a human touch, e.g. considering whether the change proposal is just fundamentally *wrong* in some way and advising the submitter before it reaches FESCo, or checking in with maintainers to request status updates and query whether Changes should be deferred. (Sure, you can have automatic comments, but a human touch is substantially better for this). Ideally it should involve *much* less drudge work, and it definitely doesn't need to be a full-time job on its own, but I still think we should always have a designated human wrangler. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @[email protected] https://www.happyassassin.net -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
