For fedora-review, I started a discussion here https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/539, hoping it would be more straightforward.
Personally, I wanted to move the project to GitHub, but forge.fedoraproject.org seems to be preferred by others. I am not against this but what concerns me is CI. I've heard rumors that action runners might not be available on that instance, which would really be a -1 from me. Can anyone please clarify what the actual situation is? Thank you very much, Jakub On Sat, Feb 28, 2026 at 7:00 PM Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 10:58 PM Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 2:28 PM Maxwell G <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 2/14/26 9:56 AM, Fabio Valentini via packaging wrote: > > > > There's some tools maintained on pagure.io (rpmdevtools, > > > > fedora-review, ...) that don't neatly fit into any SIGs > > > > responsibilities. And on the other hand, the Packaging Committee will > > > > also need to move the Packaging Guidelines repo from pagure.io at > some > > > > point. > > > > > > > > So ... maybe these two things actually fit together - in a > "packaging" > > > > org on forge.fedoraproject.org? Especially fedora-review is clearly > > > > Packaging Guidelines related, so it would fit well with FPC stuff > IMO. > > > > > > > > One thing that would need to be figured out is how to set up the > > > > permission structure for the org though, but that could probably be > > > > worked out too. What do you think? > > > > > > That makes sense to me, but we'd need to make sure that permissions are > > > set so that any packager can create a repository in this org but > > > permissions are managed on a per-repository basis. > > > > I'm not sure about that, I expect this to be a place for the FPC to > > host stuff related to the packaging guidelines. I'm also not sure that > > the forge people would be happy if we gave any way for anyone to > > create projects. They *really* don't want that. > > I agree. I didn't mean to suggest that this become a "catch-all" > namespace / org for "whatever packaging tools don't fit within an > existing SIG", > but specifically for Packaging Guidelines and related stuff like > fedora-review. > > Fabio > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
