On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 2:28 PM Maxwell G <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2/14/26 9:56 AM, Fabio Valentini via packaging wrote: > > There's some tools maintained on pagure.io (rpmdevtools, > > fedora-review, ...) that don't neatly fit into any SIGs > > responsibilities. And on the other hand, the Packaging Committee will > > also need to move the Packaging Guidelines repo from pagure.io at some > > point. > > > > So ... maybe these two things actually fit together - in a "packaging" > > org on forge.fedoraproject.org? Especially fedora-review is clearly > > Packaging Guidelines related, so it would fit well with FPC stuff IMO. > > > > One thing that would need to be figured out is how to set up the > > permission structure for the org though, but that could probably be > > worked out too. What do you think? > > That makes sense to me, but we'd need to make sure that permissions are > set so that any packager can create a repository in this org but > permissions are managed on a per-repository basis.
I'm not sure about that, I expect this to be a place for the FPC to host stuff related to the packaging guidelines. I'm also not sure that the forge people would be happy if we gave any way for anyone to create projects. They *really* don't want that. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
