On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I hear both of your concerns, and I will withdraw the proposal, thanks >>> for speaking up >>> >>> >> >> These are all good comments. Is it possible to package up in a way >> that core Tomcat does not depend on it, like Costin said? >> >> > sure is, tomcat doesn't depend on it today, the new dbcp depends on > tomcat-juli.jar, so the dependency is the other way > > > > I know the current DBCP packaging sucks, and that the current DBCP >> project is stagnant. That's why I said I'd use your new code. I >> don't want to lose it completely ;) >> >> > there are two questions two be answered > 1. what source repository does it sit in > 2. If it sits under the tomcat umbrella, is it released with tomcat or as > an independent module (like mod_jk, tcnative, etc) For 1 - I'm ok with all options ( separate svn or separate dir under tomcat - maybe even with placing it in the same source tree, but with excludes and separate build file) For 2 - I think independent module has the most advantages for both tomcat and the module. Costin > > > Filip > > Yoav >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
