https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Opfer <ubuntu...@thomasopfer.de> --- (In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #22) > Do we actually understand, what would be wrong with the line > > 2\>\&1 \& echo \$! \>\"$catalina_pid_file\" \; \} $catalina_out_command "&" > > (single escaped ampersand)? I don't really know what the problem is, but it might be that this writes a PID even if nohup fails. But this is just a guess. And this problem should also appear with the old version before bug 53930. For me, this line does not really look wrong. Still, I don't like the process timing in this line. I'm asking myself whether we could omit the "&" at the end of the line. The first \& should already put the process into the background, shouldn't it? Best regards, Thomas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
