https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #31 from Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #26) (for the record) > Assuming the above is correct I think we have two options: > > 1. Revert the "&" -> "&&" change. systemd users (and possibly others) will > be required to use a PID file and to tell systemd where to find that file. > > 2. Revert both changes. systemd users will have to take no action. Users > wanting to redirect to a command will have to use a named pipe. +1 on option 2 pid-files are anathema to systemd, so let's do them a favor. Also, logging huge amounts of data to an unrotatable file is something users have to swallow if they want to dump huge amounts of data to it. Finally, using a named-pipe is possible with the original startup script, so we aren't taking anything away from anyone. > I'm leaning towards 2 on the grounds this has the least impact on > the smallest number of users. This assumes that the number of > systemd users is greater than the number of users wanting to > redirect to a command. +1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
