https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Opfer <ubuntu...@thomasopfer.de> --- > If I am understanding this correctly that would mean: > > - reverting r1848046 and r1850829 for 9.0.x > - reverting r1848048 and r1850830 for 8.5.x > - reverting r1848049 and r1850831 for 7.0.x That should at least fix the actual trouble. > Re-opening bug 53930 and resolving it as WONTFIX - suggesting that a named > pipe is used. I'm not an expert on named pipes. The documentation of mkfifo says: "However, it has to be open at both ends simultaneously before you can proceed to do any input or output operations on it. Opening a FIFO for reading normally blocks until some other process opens the same FIFO for writing, and vice versa." I don't know whether this is ok or not. I don't need the new feature from bug 53930 at all. > Assuming my understanding is correct, do we view this as sufficient to > warrant a new 9.0.x and 8.5.x release? Currently, I don't need a new version (I just use the old catalina.sh). But it might still be a good idea, because other people might run into this issue. I don't know how much work a new release really is. Best regards, Thomas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
