Costin Manolache wrote:
Tomcat 3.0 didn't have bad performance because design decisons, but
because poor implementation.
IMO 3.3 was reasonably good as performance - even for JSP. Not sure if
4.0 was so much faster at that time.
It's possible our memory is affected by our opinions - but I'm pretty
sure that lower footprint in 3.3 had a good impact on general
performance, not a bad one.

If you ever use external strings/files or similar, performance is going to be really bad. Most likely this was not enabled in your testing.

Sorry, but I have a perfectly valid reason to give a -1. It's very
simple from my perspective anyway: I will make sure I will not be using
patches such as this one, and so I will maintain my own Jasper branch
(as I am doing for the rest of the container).

It is indeed a valid -1 on your own tree :-)

Yes, but then I think I will do what the Sun folks are doing: I'll forget contributing back the useful stuff, and only come back with annoyances.

Rémy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to