On Mar 7, 2006, at 5:59 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hola,
Let's all try to stay professional.
Then why do you selectively ignore this guy's blatant whining ?
Yaroslav or whomever else is interested: if you can produce a
patch that
(a) Can be turned on or off
(b) Is set to off by default, so current behavior is unmodified
unless
the user turns it on
(c) Doesn't harm anything else
(d) Comes with a test case that shows it doesn't harm anything else
Then I'm sure you can get 3 +1 votes and have the patch incorporated.
I simply do not see any overall technical focus anymore in this
project, it's just chaos, and users, as long as they whine loud
enough seem to get anything they want included. This doesn't sound
appealing to me.
Well, 3 binding +1 votes and no (valid) vetos means that yes,
if someone wants the code enough and at least 3 of those who have
authority over the code agree, and no one has a valid veto, then
it gets in.
Otherwise you have many things, but not an ASF project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
