+1 On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:28 AM Ken Howe <kh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 Yes, let’s make the move > > > > > On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 to move all our repos to gitbox > > >> > > >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> Sent from my iPhone > > >>> > > >>>> On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> > > >> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox > > >>>> > > >>>> On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" <aba...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > > >>>>> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > > >>>>> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > > >>>>> some time. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W > > >>>>> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently > > >>>>> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much, > > >>>>> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once > > >>>>> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't > > >>>>> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> Roman. > > >>>> > > >>>> Now that we’ve got some experience with gitbox on geode-native, are > we > > >>>> ready to convert the other repos? > > >>>> > > >>>> - geode > > >>>> - geode-site > > >>>> - geode-examples > > >>>> > > >>>> I think we should. > > >>>> > > >>>> Anthony > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
