+1 Yes, let’s make the move
> On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 to move all our repos to gitbox
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF
>>>>> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being
>>>>> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite
>>>>> some time.
>>>>>
>>>>> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W
>>>>> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently
>>>>> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much,
>>>>> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once
>>>>> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't
>>>>> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Roman.
>>>>
>>>> Now that we’ve got some experience with gitbox on geode-native, are we
>>>> ready to convert the other repos?
>>>>
>>>> - geode
>>>> - geode-site
>>>> - geode-examples
>>>>
>>>> I think we should.
>>>>
>>>> Anthony
>>>
>>
