+1 to move all our repos to gitbox On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox > > > > On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > >> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > >> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > >> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > >> some time. > >> > >> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W > >> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently > >> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf > >> > >> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much, > >> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once > >> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't > >> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Roman. > > > > Now that we’ve got some experience with gitbox on geode-native, are we > > ready to convert the other repos? > > > > - geode > > - geode-site > > - geode-examples > > > > I think we should. > > > > Anthony >
