+1 On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 to move all our repos to gitbox > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > > > +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox > > > > > > On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > > >> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > > >> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > > >> some time. > > >> > > >> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W > > >> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently > > >> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf > > >> > > >> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much, > > >> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once > > >> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't > > >> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Roman. > > > > > > Now that we’ve got some experience with gitbox on geode-native, are we > > > ready to convert the other repos? > > > > > > - geode > > > - geode-site > > > - geode-examples > > > > > > I think we should. > > > > > > Anthony > > >
