Having to deal with a github repo instead of branches off of the Apache
repo is an additional burden on committers.
I still vote -1 and don't see a lot of support for this idea.
On 6/13/17 3:03 PM, Jacob Barrett wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:57 AM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io>
wrote:
It places an unnecessary burden on committers
Considering committers need to use PR to commit changes from non-committers
how does reducing the number of review systems increase the burden on
committers?
and git history is the
definitive record of changes to the code so github pr history isn't
really very useful.
All unsquashed commit history is preserved through a PR.
