On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:37 AM Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Proposal as written says "...for changes that would require peer review > before committing...". > If this means that minor changes (in my case, typo repairs are the common > case) can be checked in without going through a PR process, I can go with > the group decision. > The proposal only changes the method for items that would have normally gone through a review board. It isn't proposing a change to the items that are reviewed.
