On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:57 AM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> It places an unnecessary burden on committers Considering committers need to use PR to commit changes from non-committers how does reducing the number of review systems increase the burden on committers? > and git history is the > definitive record of changes to the code so github pr history isn't > really very useful. All unsquashed commit history is preserved through a PR.
