That's correct. I flipped mine around half way down the list. I love to
delete the old LogWriter log levels to eliminate this confusion...


On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> I believe this is the mapping:
>
> LogWriter                 Log4J2
> ---------------------------------------
> SEVERE                = FATAL
> ERROR                 = ERROR
> WARNING             = WARN
> INFO, CONFIG      = INFO
> FINE                      = DEBUG
> FINER, FINEST     = TRACE
>
> We do have a lot of code that still uses the LogWriter.
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Here's the equivalent log levels between LogWriter levels and Log4J2
> levels
> >
> > LogWriter   Log4J2
> > ------------------------
> > SEVERE    = FATAL
> > ERROR     = ERROR
> > WARN      = WARNING
> > INFO      = INFO, CONFIG
> > DEBUG     = FINE
> > TRACE     = FINER, FINEST
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Darrel Schneider <
> dschnei...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > My understanding is the geode fine, finer, finest all map to log4j
> debug.
> > > If we get rid of the geode levels would all three fine* levels be
> enabled
> > > when the log level is debug?
> > > If so this might be a problem because finest can be way too much.
> > >
> > > I think geode's config and info both map to log4j info and I'm find
> with
> > > info logging both config and info.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <
> sbawas...@pivotal.io
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 to making the change and updating the docs to reflect only the new
> > log
> > > > levels.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:45 AM Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Geode, before using log4j for logging has implemented its own
> > > LogWriters
> > > > > and logLevels. Geode log levels has values like "finest, finer,
> fine,
> > > > > config, info, warning, error, severe".  We've moved away from using
> > > these
> > > > > log writers to favor using log4j logging. So, mostly, geode logs
> have
> > > > log4j
> > > > > log statements with levels like "fatal, error, warn, info, debug".
> > > > >
> > > > > But by examining our existing commands that has log-level options,
> > > > > specifically "start server", "start locator", "alter runtime",
> > "change
> > > > > log-level", these commands are still accepting log-levels with
> geode
> > > log
> > > > > levels, and under the cover, it has a mapping to the log4j levels.
> > > Since
> > > > we
> > > > > are moving away from geode's own logging, I would like to propose
> > > > changing
> > > > > these commands to use log4j log levels explicitly.
> > > > >
> > > > > To avoid breaking existing commands, we can provide a mapping to
> the
> > > > log4j
> > > > > levels after user provides an "old" log level, but at least I would
> > > like
> > > > to
> > > > > have the auto complete start showing the log4j levels instead of
> the
> > > > geode
> > > > > log levels and move towards getting rid of these old levels
> > completely.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > >
> > > > > Jinmei
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Jinmei
>

Reply via email to