On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> * LANG-532 -> Should be resolved for 3.0.2; or we should remove the code >> added. >> >> I'm feeling towards -1 for 3.0.2, Adding [collections] code feels of scope >> for a x.x.x maintenance release and needs more debate. I'd prefer to release >> a generics version of collection/trunk. > > I don't believe we'll ever see such a thing. I agree though for most > of the Collections code, but both Comparable and Iterable are within > scope for Lang. If Collections is dead, then I don't see a reason to > avoid those areas. > > The other items mentiond in LANG-532 are all -1 for me (thus haven't > gone in - just comparable code so far, with discussion of iterable in > other issues). >
This is the only pending item for 3.0.2 (or 3.1 once we reversion). Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
