On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> * LANG-532 -> Should be resolved for 3.0.2; or we should remove the code > added. > > I'm feeling towards -1 for 3.0.2, Adding [collections] code feels of scope > for a x.x.x maintenance release and needs more debate. I'd prefer to release > a generics version of collection/trunk. I don't believe we'll ever see such a thing. I agree though for most of the Collections code, but both Comparable and Iterable are within scope for Lang. If Collections is dead, then I don't see a reason to avoid those areas. The other items mentiond in LANG-532 are all -1 for me (thus haven't gone in - just comparable code so far, with discussion of iterable in other issues). > This code as is could be 3.1 because we've added features, even if its just > a couple of APIs. I am not sure how strict we want to be here. Yeah - I was realizing that we really should be releasing 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and saving the bugfix release for immediate 'oops' releases. > I do not seen commits linked in JIRA, perhaps the code was committed with > out the proper comments in the format "[LANG-532] ...". Separate email on > that coming... Random miss :) I do that a lot and also paste the svn commit into the issue out of a lingering distrust for the system (very lingering; it used to be weak in 2006 :) ). Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
