On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Nicholas Nethercote <n.netherc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Benjamin Smedberg <benja...@smedbergs.us> > wrote: >> You shouldn't need to annotate the file/line separately, because that is >> (or at least should be!) the top of the stack. > > Yes. Don't get hung up on the lack of annotations. It isn't much of a > problem; you can click through easily enough. I have filed bug 1277104 > to fix the handful of instances that are showing up in practice, but > it'll only be a minor improvement.
Perhaps this isn't meant for me then? I looked at the query from the first post, but it's just noise to me. If it included the file that it crashed from, it would suddenly be very useful, since it'd then be trivial to see if there's something relevant to me. As it stands now, the query alone doesn't seem useful to me. If it's meant to be useful to developers who write MOZ_CRASHes, this is a problem. If not, please ignore! I would be extremely interested in MOZ_CRASHes and friends automatically getting bugs filed and needinfo'd. An index of crashes-by-file would get half-way there for me. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
