On 2014-04-15, 5:58 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
On 15/04/2014 22:34, K. Gadd wrote:
Arguably if you wait for other vendors to expose VR before you do it,
you'll end up having to implement a sub-standard proprietary API like
you did with Web Audio.
We had an alternative implementation + API (
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Audio_Data_API ). I don't know if it exactly
predated Web Audio, but I'm fairly sure qualifying us as "waiting for
other vendors" in that domain is not fair, which also casts doubt on
your assertion that
> If you're first to the market (even with a
prototype that's preffed off), you can exert a lot more pressure on
how things turn out, IMO.
The Audio Data API does predate Web Audio but it's actually much worse,
and I'm glad that we did not end up with that as _the_ solution for
audio on the Web. :-) Now, let's get back to solving Vlad's problem.
Cheers,
Ehsan
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
