Angelo Bertolli wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: >> Angelo Bertolli wrote: >> >> >>> I'm not clear on why Firefox couldn't be put in non-free though. (I >>> just figured it was for upgrades.) >>> >> >> Why put something in non-free if trivial changes to the name and artwork >> makes it free? >> > No, I mean a non-free firefox package in addition to iceweasel.
I understand that is what you intended, though I think my question is still valid even in that circumstance. Why put something in non-free if a trivial change makes it free? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
