On Monday 29 January 2007 18:40, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 January 2007 18:36, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> Martin Schulze wrote:
> >> > Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> > Maybe not, because the name change makes it visible for him that
> >> > there has been a change indeed.  Changes from 1.0 to 1.5 or 1.5
> >> > to 2.0 may be accepted as upstream changes that just happen. 
> >> > Remember the Cola tests?  Blindfolded have preferred Pepsi over
> >> > Coca, with eyes open the result they preferred the Coca variant.
> >>
> >> I took the Pepsi Challenge and they video taped it.  Pepsi lost
> >> blindfolded. Funny how you didn't see me in the Pepsi ads...
> >
> > What makes you think that's the reason they didn't show you? ;-)
>
> I was far from the only person who came up Coke in that particular
> supermarket lineup.  Either Portland's weird (but we already knew
> that), or Pepsi's marketing strategy was seriously flawed (hence
> "marketing strategy" and not "scientific survey").  After watching
> this frustrated group go through several taste testers all coming up
> Coke, I started to wonder if they just ran the challenge until
> someone finally got Pepsi and they had the footage they needed...

Uh, Paul... Er, that was a joke.

Hal


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to