On Monday 29 January 2007 18:40, Paul Johnson wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > On Sunday 28 January 2007 18:36, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> Martin Schulze wrote: > >> > Mike Hommey wrote: > >> > Maybe not, because the name change makes it visible for him that > >> > there has been a change indeed. Changes from 1.0 to 1.5 or 1.5 > >> > to 2.0 may be accepted as upstream changes that just happen. > >> > Remember the Cola tests? Blindfolded have preferred Pepsi over > >> > Coca, with eyes open the result they preferred the Coca variant. > >> > >> I took the Pepsi Challenge and they video taped it. Pepsi lost > >> blindfolded. Funny how you didn't see me in the Pepsi ads... > > > > What makes you think that's the reason they didn't show you? ;-) > > I was far from the only person who came up Coke in that particular > supermarket lineup. Either Portland's weird (but we already knew > that), or Pepsi's marketing strategy was seriously flawed (hence > "marketing strategy" and not "scientific survey"). After watching > this frustrated group go through several taste testers all coming up > Coke, I started to wonder if they just ran the challenge until > someone finally got Pepsi and they had the footage they needed...
Uh, Paul... Er, that was a joke. Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]