Paul Johnson wrote: > Angelo Bertolli wrote: > > >> Paul Johnson wrote: >> >>> Angelo Bertolli wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm not clear on why Firefox couldn't be put in non-free though. (I >>>> just figured it was for upgrades.) >>>> >>>> >>> Why put something in non-free if trivial changes to the name and artwork >>> makes it free? >>> >>> >> No, I mean a non-free firefox package in addition to iceweasel. >> > > I understand that is what you intended, though I think my question is still > valid even in that circumstance. Why put something in non-free if a > trivial change makes it free? >
Because some users may want to use the canonical Firefox. And it may solve some arguments. Anyway, as long as it's in non-free, why not as long as someone is willing to do it? Although I'll admit, even though it's very little effort, it's a bit more effort than it's worth when you can just download Firefox off the website. Angelo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
