Hal Vaughan wrote: > On Sunday 28 January 2007 18:33, Paul Johnson wrote: > ... >> > Do you see a difference? >> >> You could have cancelled and looked into why that is. iceweasel >> provides firefox because it *is* firefox. There is no functional >> difference between firefox and iceweasel. You're making a mountain >> out of a molehill. > > Just what was taken out as non-free if it doesn't effect functionality? > If it doesn't make a difference, why is it in there? Or have all the > non-free things been replaced by free code already?
The name and the logos. Yes, it really was as trivial as that. Otherwise Iceweasel and Firefox are identical. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
