Paul Johnson wrote: > Angelo Bertolli wrote: > > >> I'm not clear on why Firefox couldn't be put in non-free though. (I >> just figured it was for upgrades.) >> > > Why put something in non-free if trivial changes to the name and artwork > makes it free? > No, I mean a non-free firefox package in addition to iceweasel. I know it sounds redundant, but I bet someone will start doing it eventually since all it takes is using Mozilla's Linux binary and putting it in deb format.
Angelo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
