On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 23:06:02 +0200, Carsten Leonhardt <l...@debian.org> wrote: >Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> writes: > >> Maybe, instead than retrofitting a policy on the debian salsa group, a >> good way to both clarify the situation and allow an opt-in mechanism >> would be to create another group on salsa, with rules clearly defined >> from the start, and let maintainers decide of the maintenance model they >> want for the package they currently maintain. After all it's very simple >> to move projects between groups in salsa, and just requires an upload to >> update the VCS fields. > >This would have my vote. I moved my packages to the debian namespace to >ease git access for others, also for the case that a package might have >to be passed to another maintainer. At the time the debian namespace was >introduced, I've read nothing about implied upload rights. If I had, I >wouldn't have put my packages there. It was only later that some people >wrote about supposed upload rights, but I never saw a source cited for >the claim.
I feel the same. Greetings Marc -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Rhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
