debian-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Colin Watson
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Colin Watson
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Marc Haber
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Roberto C . Sánchez
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Colin Watson
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Roberto C . Sánchez
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? The Wanderer
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Marc Haber
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Alexandru Mihail
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Mario Limonciello
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Christian BAYLE
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Hakan Bayındır
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Hakan Bayındır
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Marc Haber
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Bill Allombert
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Richard Lewis
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Holger Levsen
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Richard Lewis
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Marc Haber
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Marc Haber
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Colin Watson
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Marc Haber
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Sean Whitton
  • Re: Interesting learnings about Guix contributor dynamics that apply to Debian? Matthias Geiger
• #1011572: toilet: Salsa Kirill Rekhov
  • Re: #1011572: toilet: Salsa Daniel Lange
• Bug#1106208: ITP: moonlight-qt -- GameStream client for PCs Jianfeng Liu
• Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge? Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge? Daniel Baumann
  • Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge? Thomas Hochstein
  • Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge? Daniel Baumann
• The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Antoine Le Gonidec
  • Re: The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Antoine Le Gonidec
  • Re: The Debian Mono "Team" needs help Aaron Rainbolt
• Bug#1106128: ITP: pipemixer -- TUI for pipewire Matthias Geiger
• Using alternatives system for directories? Christian Kastner
  • Re: Using alternatives system for directories? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: Using alternatives system for directories? Christian Kastner
• Bug#1106085: ITP: play.it-rpg -- ./play.it collection - Role-playing games Antoine Le Gonidec
• Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Roland Mas
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Roland Mas
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Richard Lewis
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Holger Levsen
  • Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: [git-buildpackage] Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper Guido Günther
• Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes gregor herrmann
  • Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• Bug#1105987: ITP: libterm-choose-linefold-xs-perl -- XS acceleration for Term-Choose-LineFold gregor herrmann
• Bug#1105982: ITP: env-dot -- tool to read environment variables from .env file gregor herrmann
• Bug#1105933: ITP: libcrypt-sysrandom-perl -- Perl interface to system randomness gregor herrmann
• Bug#1105936: ITP: libcrypt-sysrandom-xs-perl -- Perl interface to system randomness, XS version gregor herrmann
• Bug#1105868: ITP: oniux -- Kernel-level Tor isolation for any Linux app Yifei Zhan
• Bug#1105844: ITP: golang-github-xo-tblfmt -- treaming, buffered table encoder for result sets (ie from a database) Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105845: ITP: golang-github-ziutek-telnet -- Go library for handling Telnet connections Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105842: ITP: golang-github-google-goexpect -- Go implementation of Expect (library) Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105843: ITP: golang-github-mattn-go-sixel -- Go library for DRCS Sixel graphics encoding and decoding Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105841: ITP: golang-github-gohxs-readline -- Go implementation of GNU Readline (library) Otto Kekalainen
• Bug#1105839: ITP: ovpn-dkms -- OpenVPN data channel offload (ovpn) Bernhard Schmidt
• Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Simon McVittie
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Holger Levsen
  • Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch Andreas Metzler
• Is there any planned official Debian 12 Bookworm support for Raspberry Pi 5? Odephus
  • Re: Is there any planned official Debian 12 Bookworm support for Raspberry Pi 5? Marc Haber
  • Re: Is there any planned official Debian 12 Bookworm support for Raspberry Pi 5? Cyril Brulebois
• Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Santiago Vila
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Santiago Vila
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Henrik Ahlgren
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Santiago Vila
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Lucas Nussbaum
• Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andreas Tille
• Re: Adding Pre-Depends from linux-image packages to linux-base Ben Hutchings
• Re: Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Thomas Lange
  • Re: Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Philipp Kern
  • Re: Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Helge Kreutzmann
  • Re: Broken in links in Debian History document - old news removed from www.debian.org Thomas Lange
• Re: Upcoming d-i release vs. hard freeze Simon McVittie
  • Re: Upcoming d-i release vs. hard freeze Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: Upcoming d-i release vs. hard freeze Cyril Brulebois
• Pythonista wanted for help with tag2upload testing Ian Jackson
  • tag2upload progress report (was Re: Pythonista wanted for help with tag2upload testing) Ian Jackson
• Re: Dropping awk? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Dropping awk? Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: Dropping awk? Andrea Pappacoda
  • Re: Dropping awk? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Dropping awk? Holger Levsen
  • Re: Dropping awk? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Dropping awk? Marc Haber
  • Re: Dropping awk? Guillem Jover
  • Re: Dropping awk? Marco d'Itri
• Re: ITN procedure - more words, fewer acronyms please? Simon McVittie
  • Re: ITN procedure - more words, fewer acronyms please? Wookey
• Using official Debian images in podman Enrico Zini
  • Re: Using official Debian images in podman Jérémy Lal
• Re: ITN procedure? Andreas Tille
• Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? Andreas Tille
• Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Julien Plissonneau Duquène
• Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Holger Levsen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Holger Levsen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Bálint Réczey
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Simon Josefsson
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Andrius Merkys
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Jonathan McDowell
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Peter B
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Ananthu C V
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Charles Plessy
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Sean Whitton
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Simon McVittie
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Marco d'Itri
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Andrey Rakhmatullin
• Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Gioele Barabucci
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Santiago Vila
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) thomas
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools gregor herrmann
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference gregor herrmann

• Later messages