debian-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Philip Hands
  • Re: NEW review & revision process (or lack thereof) (Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)) Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Bits from DPL Sean Whitton
  • Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Philip Hands
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Maytham Alsudany
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Maytham Alsudany
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Charles Plessy
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Simon McVittie
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bits from DPL Marc Haber
  • STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Holger Levsen
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Marc Haber
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Soren Stoutner
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Pirate Praveen
  • Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL) Holger Levsen
  • Re: Bits from DPL Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Bits from DPL Pierre-Elliott Bécue
  • Re: Bits from DPL Leandro Cunha
  • Re: Bits from DPL Matthias Urlichs
  • Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Timo Röhling
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Timo Röhling
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Sean Whitton
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Faidon Liambotis
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Wookey
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL) Timo Röhling
• minisign support in uscan nick black
  • Re: minisign support in uscan nick black
  • Re: minisign support in uscan Simon Josefsson
  • Re: minisign support in uscan Yadd
  • Re: minisign support in uscan Simon Josefsson
  • Re: minisign support in uscan nick black
  • Re: minisign support in uscan Simon Josefsson
  • Re: minisign support in uscan nick black
• Bug#1092789: ITP: r-cran-reformulas -- GNU R package to work with random effects formulas Dirk Eddelbuettel
• Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Fabio Fantoni
  • Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers gregor herrmann
  • Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Fabio Fantoni
  • Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers M. Zhou
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people Philipp Kern
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Call for contributions to maintain existing documentation - Salsa makes it is easy! (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Call for contributions to maintain existing documentation - Salsa makes it is easy! Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: Call for contributions to maintain existing documentation - Salsa makes it is easy! Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas
  • Re: Call for contributions to maintain existing documentation - Salsa makes it is easy! Jonas Smedegaard
  • wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine nick black
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Kunal Mehta
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Steve McIntyre
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Steve McIntyre
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Andrej Shadura
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine Jonathan Dowland
  • What's next for the Debian Wiki? (was Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine) Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Call for contributions to maintain existing documentation - Salsa makes it is easy! Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Call for contributions to maintain existing documentation - Salsa makes it is easy! Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: Call for contributions to maintain existing documentation - Salsa makes it is easy! Jan Dittberner
  • Re: Call for contributions to maintain existing documentation - Salsa makes it is easy! Steve McIntyre
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Colin Watson
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (WAS: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (WAS: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Ángel
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers M. Zhou
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people Philipp Kern
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people M. Zhou
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people Helmut Grohne
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people Simon Richter
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Philip Hands
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people M. Zhou
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Holger Levsen
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Holger Levsen
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Holger Levsen
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people Simon Richter
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Andreas Tille
  • Re: Project-wide LLM budget for helping people (was: Re: Complete and unified documentation for new maintainers Holger Levsen
• Bug#1092770: ITP: python-crypt-r -- A copy of the crypt module that was removed in Python 3.13 Bo YU
• Bug#1092763: RFP: elpa-empv -- Empv.el provides a better command of the mpv player utility from within emacs, than the existing elpa-mpv package k4r4b3y
• Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes Raphael Hertzog
  • Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes gregor herrmann
  • Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes Raphael Hertzog
  • Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes Guido Günther
  • Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes gregor herrmann
  • Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: Towards DEP-14 acceptance and recently proposed changes Raphael Hertzog
• Thanks for sqv in apt Ian Jackson
• Re: DEP17 /usr-move: most mitigations (M18) for aliased diversions (P3) are broken Helmut Grohne
  • Re: DEP17 /usr-move: most mitigations (M18) for aliased diversions (P3) are broken Helmut Grohne
  • Re: DEP17 /usr-move: most mitigations (M18) for aliased diversions (P3) are broken Helmut Grohne
• Bug#1092666: ITP: safetensors -- Simple, safe way to store and distribute tensors Mo Zhou
• Theme for Trixie: Ceratopsian in the installer Roland Clobus
  • Re: Theme for Trixie: Ceratopsian in the installer Aurélien COUDERC
• Re: criteria for acceptable languages for central QA tools in Debian (was: Re: coordination between lintian/piuparts/adequate) Soren Stoutner
• Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Frank Guthausen
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Andreas Metzler
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Frank Guthausen
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Julian Andres Klode
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Simon Josefsson
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Simon Josefsson
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Simon Josefsson
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Jonathan McDowell
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Simon Josefsson
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Sune Vuorela
  • handling the OpenPGP schism safely in Debian [was: Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze] Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: handling the OpenPGP schism safely in Debian [was: Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze] Sune Vuorela
  • Re: handling the OpenPGP schism safely in Debian [was: Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze] Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: handling the OpenPGP schism safely in Debian [was: Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze] Sune Vuorela
  • Re: handling the OpenPGP schism safely in Debian [was: Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze] Simon Josefsson
  • Re: handling the OpenPGP schism safely in Debian [was: Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze] Steve McIntyre
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Andreas Metzler
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Jonathan McDowell
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Luca Boccassi
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Andrew Gallagher
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Simon Josefsson
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Marco d'Itri
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Simon Josefsson
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Marco d'Itri
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Simon Josefsson
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Andrew Gallagher
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze andrewg
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Frank Guthausen
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Andreas Metzler
  • Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze Stephan Verbücheln
• Re: getting ziggy with it nick black
  • Re: getting ziggy with it Stéphane Glondu

• Later messages