Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Prior to GFDL, GNU Manuals used to have the same kinds of restrictions >> like invariant sections but noone has ever battled for moving them >> to non-free. Then came GFDL and people suddenly decided to change >> the "de facto" rules. This is the kind of consistency I'm talking >> about (whether invariant sections should be allowed or not). > > Debian was mostly unaware of the existence of these invariant > sections, and the problem had not been greatly discussed.
Do you mean people never read licenses before? > I was aware of it, but at the time I still believed that the GFDL > passed the DFSG. Prior to GFDL inception, you did not speak up about those invariant section, didn't you? -- Jérôme Marant
