Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > >> On Feb 09, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> This was necessary only because the release manager believed the changes >>> to be non-editorial. I cannot even understand an interpretation of the >>> old wording that can lead us to accept non-free documentation into main. > >> This may be annoying for you, but it's a fact that there is an >> interpretation of the old wording which has been used for years to >> accept non-free documentation into main. > > How is this relevant?
Consistency? -- Jérôme Marant
