Hi Sean,

Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes:

> Hello Xiyue,
>
> Thanks.  I think you sent the wrong patches

Oops, sorry.

> but I had a look at your
> branch on salsa.  This still isn't quite what I mean.  I think that
>
> - you should be using the Emacs built binary (as you are now doing)
> - we should not commit the file emacs-common-substvars to git.
>   Instead it should be generated during the build.
>
> So the main thing missing is that the generating of the file should be
> incorporated into the build.  Probably it should go into the existing
> override_dh_auto_install.
>

I understand that this file is mostly useful during package building.
Still, I'd like to give another try to propose to have
debian/emacs-common-substvars committed in git: this will help with
debugging in the following scenarios:

* When we want to understand why some packages are (or not) being
  replaces by Emacs, and

* When we want to see what packages are updated between Emacs releases
  (which is also why I put a package+version per line in the comments).

Without this file, we need to get this information from `apt show' or
from https://packages.debian.org/ which would be very cumbersome and
hard to get it right.

Wdyt?

> -- 
> Sean Whitton

-- 
Regards,
Xiyue Deng

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to