Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes: > Hello, > > On Tue 15 Jul 2025 at 10:45am -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > >> Acknowledged. I thought there was a bug report from Stefano about the >> upgrading issue regarding Emacs backports, which turns out to be just an >> email to debian-backports[1]. That said, Cyril seemed to support this >> idea for a better upgrade experience, though not officially as a RT >> member. As the issue is real, maybe we can file this as an important >> bug? (It would sound a bit like tricking the system though but not >> really :P) >> >> Still, I'm also OK with postponing this to Forky to avoid causing >> additional issues. > > No -- my suggestion is to add manually generated > Provides/Conflicts/etc. to trixie to fix this problem. >
Just to confirm: is the substvars based solution OK for Trixie (as done in my updated patchs in my other email), or were you expecting the provides/replaces info directly put in d/control (like my earlier approach based on d/control.in but only keep the generated d/control)? > -- > Sean Whitton -- Regards, Xiyue Deng
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
