On 2023-04-02 17:44:37 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > Antonio, > do you think it makes sense, if I reassign the bug report to > ruby-soap4r? > > The circumstantial evidence collected during the investigation that you > and Vincent have carried out seems to suggest that the issue is > probably due to ruby-soap4r, although we do not have conclusive > evidence...
I have some serious doubts that the cause is ruby-soap4r. First, this would mean that it would instruct apt-listbugs to read some particular files, and I don't see how apt-listbugs could get the filenames (and as said, since the server is implemented in Perl, the filenames would not come from the server). Moreover, would that yield an error message prepended with "E: "? (The messages with "E: " seem to be those generated by apt-listbugs only.) Also, I recall that the error message at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019732#34 has $stdout.print " " * Unicode.width(@old) ^^^^^^ What would generate this output with carets below the line that comes from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/aptlistbugs/logic.rb? -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
