On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:25:23 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 03:40:21AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2023-03-28 20:37:56 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > Still, I see no evidence that this is caused by the Ruby interpreter.
> > > For example apt-listbugs uses a SOAP library that is severely
> > > unmaintained upstream and has been on life support for some time now.
[...]

Hi Antonio,
is there a better alternative SOAP client library for Ruby in Debian?

Searching [the] [web], I've seen some people recommending [Savon], but I
cannot find it in Debian, not even in an ITP or RFP bug report...

[the]: 
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40273/whats-the-best-way-to-use-soap-with-ruby>
[web]: 
<https://medium.com/@victoria.huang/setting-up-a-ruby-soap-client-2237fc46170a>
[Savon]: <https://www.savonrb.com/>

Any other alternative?

More maintained forks of ruby-soap4r?
Maybe [rubyjedi's fork], but that is also not too alive (last commit in
2018...).

[rubyjedi's fork]: <https://github.com/rubyjedi/soap4r>




-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpSIpvT_oa1G.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to