On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 08:28:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:25:23 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 03:40:21AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2023-03-28 20:37:56 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > Still, I see no evidence that this is caused by the Ruby interpreter. > > > > For example apt-listbugs uses a SOAP library that is severely > > > > unmaintained upstream and has been on life support for some time now. > [...] > > Hi Antonio, > is there a better alternative SOAP client library for Ruby in Debian? > > Searching [the] [web], I've seen some people recommending [Savon], but I > cannot find it in Debian, not even in an ITP or RFP bug report... > > [the]: > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40273/whats-the-best-way-to-use-soap-with-ruby> > [web]: > <https://medium.com/@victoria.huang/setting-up-a-ruby-soap-client-2237fc46170a> > [Savon]: <https://www.savonrb.com/> > > Any other alternative? > > More maintained forks of ruby-soap4r? > Maybe [rubyjedi's fork], but that is also not too alive (last commit in > 2018...). > > [rubyjedi's fork]: <https://github.com/rubyjedi/soap4r>
I have no idea, I never worked on anything that needed to support SOAP, except the occasional patch for apt-listbugs itself. savon looks more active, having a release last December. But maybe just updating soap4r based on that fork (which seems abandoned in 2018) is good enough? I don't know.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
