On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 06:07:58PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Thanks for testing.
Of course. build logs ftw :) > It's still a mystery to me when sbuild > will work on not.... I'd be very happy to be enlightened. > That sbuild *only* looks at the first alternative doesn't seem > to be the whole truth. No, really - It does :) The --build-dep-resolver flag may be helpful here -- from the manpage: The apt resolver is the most appropriate resolver for most users, for building for unstable, stable and other distri‐ butions. If alternative build dependencies are used (excluding architecture restrictions), only the first alternative will be used; the others will be ignored. You can change sbuild's behavior, but not on the buildds. > > Please execute such NMUs before requesting removal. > > Ok no problem, just have to ask though - is it work doing it > now since lxsession is already RC-buggy? Ah! Better information to add; if all these packages are already rc-buggy, noting which are that you're intending to break would be very helpful indeed. > Regards, > Andreas Henriksson Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
