Hello Adam! Thanks for the feedback.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 04:42:12PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > It's _not_ fine. lxsession has: "Build-Depends: [...] valac-0.14 | > valac" and sbuild will only consider the first alternative. Removing > vala-0.14 will therefore make lxsession FTBFS in unstable. How come "valac (>= not-yet-in-archive) | valac-0.XX" works? Anyway, worst case a trivial NMU is needed for lxsession. Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
