On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 01:02:40PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > How come "valac (>= not-yet-in-archive) | valac-0.XX" works? > > I patched lxsession to depend on valac-0.99 | valac > > I ran sbuild -d unstable -c unstable -j8 lxsession_0.4.9.2-1.dsc
Thanks for testing. It's still a mystery to me when sbuild will work on not.... I'd be very happy to be enlightened. That sbuild *only* looks at the first alternative doesn't seem to be the whole truth. > Please execute such NMUs before requesting removal. Ok no problem, just have to ask though - is it work doing it now since lxsession is already RC-buggy? Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
