Hi, On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 03:11:35PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Hi Osamu,
... > >NOTE: The package dependency resolver of the `aptitude` command tends to > >suggest mass package removals when packages in `unstable` are > >temporarily inconsistent. This situation is a bit frightening. > >Usually, "`apt-get dist-upgrade`" should resolve this situation. This > >situation seems to be caused mostly by the version skew among packages > >depended or recommended by a meta-package such as `gnome-core`. ... > > By the way, reviewing the above made me notice the note at the top. Do > we have a ticket on aptitude's issue? If not, should the reference > really be targetted to people using unstable as a default suite > anyway? Not just to people using unstable as a default suite but people upgrading from one release to another. It happens less frequently but is true. Historically, this issue was the reason behind release note mentioning only apt-get dist-upgrade. Regards, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
