On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 07:08:21PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Hi Osamu, > Thank you very much. Minor problem with the new version: there should > be something after "facts" - either a period, or - IMO most > appropriate - a colon. I personally do not like that sentence much for > 2 reasons: > > * I would expect a document as official as the Debian reference to > avoid... referring... to its author. * Calling aptitude "very nice" > may create some exagerated expectations for many new users who expect > a nice tool to feature a GUI. > > Your change clarifies a lot what the current version is trying to warn > about and makes it much simpler for me to express what I think is > wrong with it: > > * I see nothing wrong with the first fact, as phrased in the Git > version. * My problem is with the second fact: o If this is a > warning about a bug, we really should have a ticket on it before > writing user documentation about it. If this is not about a bug, > speaking of a "resol[ution]" seems misleading (and if one has to use > apt-get in these contexts, it does sound like a bug). o If this > problem is merely about unstable, I do not think the reference should > put such emphasis on it. I never used aptitude due to a number of > problems it had when I adopted Debian, but if I understand correctly > what this problem is about, I wouldn't think it affects testing.
Mmmmm... So what do you propose as alternative. Please make a full proposal. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
