Hi, On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:30:27PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Sun 15 Apr 2012, Jeffrey Sheinberg wrote: > > Cc: Jeffrey Sheinberg <j...@bsrd.net>, 636...@bugs.debian.org, Debian Bug > > Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org> > > Please don't resend things about an existing big report to submit@b.d.o > as that address is only for opening new reports. Sorry about that - I did a group (g) reply from mutt and I neglected to check the Cc: header carefully. I will be more careful in the future. Thanks for pointing this out to me. > Please look at your process list while you're doing such a purely local > transfer. As I tried to make clear: "The protocol is also used on local > transfers between communicating rsync processes". You will see more than > one rsync process running, one is the sender part, the other is the > receiving part. If you say so, then I trust you that rsync uses multiple processes for purely local transfers. I had read in the rsync(1) man page that rsync does optimizations for local transfers - sorry for the ass-umption on my part. Thanks, -- Jeffrey Sheinberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
