On Sun 15 Apr 2012, Jeffrey Sheinberg wrote: > Cc: Jeffrey Sheinberg <j...@bsrd.net>, 636...@bugs.debian.org, Debian Bug > Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>
Please don't resend things about an existing big report to submit@b.d.o as that address is only for opening new reports. > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 02:02:25PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > > > Yes, I've seen the same thing. > > > > I believe it's a limitation of the rsync protocol currently, only > > seconds are transferred. (The protocol is also used on local transfers > > between communicating rsync processes.). > > > > I expect that this will be addressed in a future version of rsync, but > > unfortunately I can't say when that will happen. > > Just to clarify what I am doing - this is a purely local transfer, there > are no "communicating rsync processes" involved - just a single process > copying from one local directory to another. Please look at your process list while you're doing such a purely local transfer. As I tried to make clear: "The protocol is also used on local transfers between communicating rsync processes". You will see more than one rsync process running, one is the sender part, the other is the receiving part. Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
