> >Because you are a total bore and I thought that the cypherpunks list
> >had probably had enough of the argument.
>
> Here, boyz and grrlz, is a lie.
Here is a libel,
> Phill is losing ground in this argument on
> the cypherpunks list, many of his views are treated with scorn there.
So what, I stopped subscribing to cipherpunks many years ago. I have no
idea what is on topic for that list. I don't think it is computer security
very
often these days but whatever.
Libverflammage is always on topic for FC since in the absence of an
imminent resumption of CDA hostilities the list reverts to fight about
everything.
> Know the difference between a US Citizen and a foreigner criticizing a US
> President?
Nope, and I don't see why there should be one. If the US president is
an adulterer or a cretin the fact is the same regardless.
Moreover since your ilk oft repeat the claim that Reagan increased
respect for the US a counterfactual is surely in order.
> Emminent Domain.
You clearly have no idea what the term means.
> As I thought, you are incable of saying anything good about him.
He did an excellent job of performing the coin toss one superbowl.
>Clinton
> is the one who is a laughing stock, I doubt his name can be mentioned
> anywhere, without evoking images of cigars and stained blue dresses.
Good heavens, if the leader of the free world can't have some crumpet
on the side its a poor damn show.
Given what Clinton has done for the economy the Congress should vote
him a Presidential hareem and have done with it.
The whitewash job done on Reagan and Nixon makes it pretty obvious
that the history books will be pretty favourabe to Clinton. In time there
will be a Federal building named after him - if only to annoy the heck out
of the racist wing of the Republican party. My favourite idea is to rename
the FBI headquarters after him.
Phill
