Reese wrote: > > At 11:54 AM 06/04/00 +0200, Tom Vogt wrote: > >Reese wrote: > >> Of course not. They wouldn't. Europe is largely socialist, > > > >ROTFL > > > >let me guess: you've never been to europe. > > Irrelevant. Largely |= entirely, of course there will be exceptions, but > by and large, most european nations are more socialist than the US, enough > so to justify my comment. even if the "more socialist than the US" part is true (which I doubt), your conclusion still would not follow. 6 is closer to 100 than 5 is, but you wouldn't say it is "almost 100", right? > Or should we debate the meaning of "is" also? how about the meaning of "socialist"? at the moment, your definition of it seems to be "everything outside of my personal opinion".
- Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corporate Bully G... Matthew Gaylor
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corporat... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corp... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corporat... Lizard
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corporat... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corporat... Tom Vogt
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corporat... Tom Vogt
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corp... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction AsCorpo... Lizard
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corp... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Cor... Bill Stewart
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corporat... Tom Vogt
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corporat... Colin Rafferty
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As Corp... Matthew Gaylor
- Re: Microsoft: A Day Of Satisfaction As ... Colin Rafferty

