YES

> Am 13.01.2026 um 17:21 schrieb Stephen Stead via Crm-sig 
> <[email protected]>:
> 
> "The property or relation need not be part of the CRM."
> 
>  
> Stephen Stead
> Mob: +44 (0)7802 755 013
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>  
> From: Crm-sig <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
> Sent: 13 January 2026 15:47
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] issue 615 --E VOTE
>  
> Dear All,
> 
> I vote YES,
> 
> BUT! I suggest to reformulate: 
> 
> "The property or relation needs not be part of the CRM."
> 
> because this is less ambiguous for non-native speakers of English....
> 
> In answer to Martijn, see the current examples of P177:
> 
> 
>   The examination of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E13) assigned property of type 
> binding structure type (E55). [‘binding structure type’ refers to a property, 
> external to the CIDOC CRM, which connects a book (E22) to the type of its 
> binding structure (E55)] (Honey & Pickwoad, 2010)
> 
>   The condition assessment of the endband cores of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E14) 
> assigned property of type damage (E55.) [‘damage’ refers to a property, 
> external to the CIDOC CRM, which connects an instance of a physical thing 
> like an endband core (E22) to the type of damage (E55) it shows] (Honey & 
> Pickwoad, 2010)
> 
>   The condition assessment of the cover of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E14) assigned 
> property of typequality (E55). [‘quality’ refers to a property, external to 
> the CIDOC CRM, which connects an instance of a physical thing like a book 
> cover (E22) to its quality (E55)] (Honey and Pickwoad, 2010)
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/13/2026 4:07 PM, van Leusen, P.M. via Crm-sig wrote:
> Dear all, 
> the import of the phrase in bold is not clear to me. The property or relation 
> itself does not have to be part of the CRM, but assertions about it are? Can 
> this be clarified using the examples?
> Martijn
>  
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 2:40 PM Eleni Tsouloucha via Crm-sig 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Dear all, 
>  
> Please reply by yes or no to the proposal formally made at the 61st SIG 
> meeting, namely to add the clause marked in boldface to the scope note of E13 
> Attribute Assignment. 
> The reason that the group would not vote on it at the time, is that it was 
> made at the meeting. 
>  
> You have until the end of next week (23 January 2026) to vote on it. 
>  
> ++++++++++++++
> E13 Attribute Assignment
> Subclass of: E7 Activity
> 
> Superclass of: E14 Condition Assessment, E15 Identifier Assignment, E16 
> Measurement, E17 Type Assignment
> 
> Scope note: This class comprises the actions of making assertions about one 
> property of an object or any single relation between two items or concepts. 
> The property or relation does not have to be part of the CRM. The type of the 
> property asserted to hold between two items or concepts can be described by 
> the property P177 assigned property of type (is type of property assigned): 
> E55 Type.
>   
> For example, the class describes the actions of people making propositions 
> and statements during certain scientific/scholarly procedures, e.g., the 
> person and date when a condition statement was made, an identifier was 
> assigned, the museum object was measured, etc. Which kinds of such 
> assignments and statements need to be documented explicitly in structures of 
> a schema rather than free text, depends on whether this information should be 
> accessible by structured queries.
> 
> This class allows for the documentation of how the respective assignment came 
> about, and whose opinion it was. Note that all instances of properties 
> described in a knowledge base are the opinion of someone. Per default, they 
> are the opinion of the team maintaining the knowledge base. This fact must 
> not individually be registered for all instances of properties provided by 
> the maintaining team, because it would result in an endless recursion of 
> whose opinion was the description of an opinion. Therefore, the use of 
> instances of E13 Attribute Assignment marks the fact that the maintaining 
> team is in general neutral to the validity of the respective assertion, but 
> registers someone else’s opinion and how it came about.
> 
> All properties assigned in such an action can also be seen as directly 
> relating the respective pair of items or concepts. Multiple use of instances 
> of E13 Attribute Assignment may possibly lead to a collection of 
> contradictory values.
>   
> Examples:
> the examination of MS Sinai Greek 418 by Nicholas Pickwoad in November 2003 
> (Honey & Pickwoad, 2010)
> the assessment of the current ownership of Martin Doerr’s silver cup in 
> February 1997 (fictitious)
> In first-order logic: E13(x) ⇒ E7(x)
> 
> Properties: 
> P140 assigned attribute to (was attributed by): E1 CRM Entity
> P141 assigned (was assigned by): E1 CRM Entity
> P177 assigned property of type (is type of property assigned): E55 Type
> 
> +++++++++++++
>  
> All the best,
>  
> -- 
> Eleni Tsouloucha
> Philologist - MA Linguistics & Language Technologies
> Center for Cultural Informatics
> Information Systems Laboratory - Institute of Computer Science
> Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
>  
> Address: N. Plastira 100, GR-70013 Heraklion, Grece
> email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, 
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Tel: +30 2810391488
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list
>  
>  
> -- 
> Dr. Martijn van Leusen
> Associate Professor, Landscape Archaeology, Groningen Institute of Archaeology
> Poststraat 6, 9712ER Groningen (Netherlands) / phone +31 50 3636717 / +31 6 
> 18798873
> Academia page <https://rug.academia.edu/MartijnvanLeusen> - Google Scholar 
> page <https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=H6OP3MUAAAAJ>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------
>  Dr. Martin Doerr
>               
>  Honorary Head of the                                                         
>           
>  Center for Cultural Informatics
>  
>  Information Systems Laboratory  
>  Institute of Computer Science             
>  Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   
>                   
>  N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,         
>  GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece 
>    
>  Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
>  Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list

_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list

Reply via email to