YES either formulation seems fine.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 12:43 AM Pat Riva via Crm-sig <[email protected]> wrote: > YES > > (either formulation, both work well in English) > > Pat Riva > Associate University Librarian, Collection Services > Concordia University > Vanier Library (VL-301-61) > 7141 Sherbrooke Street West > Montreal, QC H4B 1R6 > Canada > [email protected] > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Eleni > Tsouloucha via Crm-sig <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:25 AM > *To:* CRM-SIG <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [Crm-sig] issue 615 --E VOTE > > > Attention This email originates from outside the concordia.ca domain. // > Ce courriel provient de l'extérieur du domaine de concordia.ca > > > > Dear all, > > Please reply by yes or no to the proposal formally made at the 61st SIG > meeting, namely to add the clause marked *in boldface* to the scope note > of E13 Attribute Assignment. > The reason that the group would not vote on it at the time, is that it was > made at the meeting. > > You have until the end of next week (23 January 2026) to vote on it. > > ++++++++++++++ > E13 Attribute Assignment > Subclass of: E7 Activity > > Superclass of: E14 Condition Assessment, E15 Identifier Assignment, E16 > Measurement, E17 Type Assignment > > Scope note: This class comprises the actions of making assertions about > one property of an object or any single relation between two items or > concepts. *The property or relation does not have to be part of the CRM.* > The type of the property asserted to hold between two items or concepts can > be described by the property P177 assigned property of type (is type of > property assigned): E55 Type. > > For example, the class describes the actions of people making propositions > and statements during certain scientific/scholarly procedures, e.g., the > person and date when a condition statement was made, an identifier was > assigned, the museum object was measured, etc. Which kinds of such > assignments and statements need to be documented explicitly in structures > of a schema rather than free text, depends on whether this information > should be accessible by structured queries. > > This class allows for the documentation of how the respective assignment > came about, and whose opinion it was. Note that all instances of properties > described in a knowledge base are the opinion of someone. Per default, they > are the opinion of the team maintaining the knowledge base. This fact must > not individually be registered for all instances of properties provided by > the maintaining team, because it would result in an endless recursion of > whose opinion was the description of an opinion. Therefore, the use of > instances of E13 Attribute Assignment marks the fact that the maintaining > team is in general neutral to the validity of the respective assertion, but > registers someone else’s opinion and how it came about. > > All properties assigned in such an action can also be seen as directly > relating the respective pair of items or concepts. Multiple use of > instances of E13 Attribute Assignment may possibly lead to a collection of > contradictory values. > > Examples: > > - the examination of MS Sinai Greek 418 by Nicholas Pickwoad in > November 2003 (Honey & Pickwoad, 2010) > - the assessment of the current ownership of Martin Doerr’s silver cup > in February 1997 (fictitious) > > In first-order logic: E13(x) ⇒ E7(x) > > Properties: > P140 assigned attribute to (was attributed by): E1 CRM Entity > P141 assigned (was assigned by): E1 CRM Entity > P177 assigned property of type (is type of property assigned): E55 Type > > +++++++++++++ > > All the best, > > -- > Eleni Tsouloucha > Philologist - MA Linguistics & Language Technologies > Center for Cultural Informatics > Information Systems Laboratory - Institute of Computer Science > Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) > > Address: N. Plastira 100, GR-70013 Heraklion, Grece > email: [email protected], [email protected] > Tel: +30 2810391488 > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list >
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list
