On 2003.03.09 17:13 Michael Scherer wrote:
Hum, and they will deny that plf is in urpmi.setup ?
Urpmi.setup is in contribs, was written by a non-employee, and the binary has absolutely no mention of PLF. In fact, removing PLF from the source code would break the pristine-sources rule anyway. :-)
They will deny that the same src.rpm is used for plf and main version of mplayer ?
Who denied that?
The same configure script is used for freetype with or without bytecode interpreter. Should we stop using freetype alltogether?
The source rpm is just a script.
And that, sometimes, some of their own developers post on plf-discuss ?
What's wrong with that?
PLF and Mandrake share no administration and no finances. The fact that many people contribute to both does not inherently make any corporate connection between them.
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assistant
Department of Chemistry, York University, Toronto
MandrakeClub Volunteer (www.mandrakeclub.com)
homepage: www.groundstate.ca