Le Dimanche 9 Mars 2003 22:22, El Gringo ( aka Andi Payn ) a �crit :
> Of course if Mandrake links to his page, they already have that extra-link
> safety--but if they want to host his document directly, they don't. And,
> more vaguely, not mentioning PLF in his document allows Mandrake to host it
> if they want while maintaining their plausible deniability related to PLF
> ("Sure, we assumed that some of our users would find and use that software,
> but we had no idea that there was some kind of organized effort, much less
> that this effort was part of the reason some people chose our
> distribution...").Hum, and they will deny that plf is in urpmi.setup ? They will deny that the same src.rpm is used for plf and main version of mplayer ? And that, sometimes, some of their own developers post on plf-discuss ? This sounds like "We lost the source code of our software", from some Seattle based corporation... -- Micka�l Scherer
